Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you're really sitting on +4 sigma talent and are lacking the money to move your plans forward, drop an email address here so I can contact you.

I am planning on putting up a 'Proposition HN' in a week, with this exact thing in mind. I want to pay talented HNers to work on their dream/vision/side-project in exchange for participation/equity.

Watch this space.



Put up a landing page now so you can collect emails from interested folks.


Fair enough Michael. Sounded like you had some plans you were unable to work on, based on that one sentence in your post.

trumanshow.. I just created a throw-away gmail account:

[email protected]

drop a line there and I'll email a link to the HN post once its fleshed out and posted.


What is "sigma talent"?


Sigma is usually used to represent the standard deviation. +4 sigma would mean four standard deviations from the mean. So in this case he is saying his talent is higher than 99.9966% of people.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation


Hmm... a brag like that is pretty difficult to measure.


So in this case he is saying his talent is higher than 99.9966% of people.

+4 sigma for certain things, not overall. It's not even possible to measure "+4 sigma overall intelligence" and if it were, I doubt I'd be the one who has it. But there are certain subdisciplines where I'm in that range.

I say "+4 sigma" because for the vast majority of companies I've observed, I could run them better, and they seem to at least think they have 2-3 sigma talent.

If we accept that the people who actually are in charge are +2 to +3 sigma minds, then I'm easily +5 based on the difference between me and them. If we assume they're idiots, then it'd be generous to give me +3. The reality is probably between the two.


Assuming it is iQ for example,i would guess that +4 sigma would mean 4*15=60 above the mean,which if you take as 100 gives 160.I would welcome a better clarification of this.


It means he knows better than you even when he doesn't. ~

~ = snark, allow me one snark ! :)


What do you mean, participation or equity?

This would have been great when I had time off to work on my compiler back in the summer. Oh well, the algorithm still had/has bugs in then anyway.


How would that work?

I'm actually reasonably happy with where I am, because I have a career strategy that I think will work. Startups aren't the only path and, if you have no connections and are going to be "just a programmer", they're not always even a good path.

Most successful entrepreneurs started in finance because, for better or worse, that's a way to build credibility. Remember that VCs are also financiers and will be biased in favor of that experience, even if it's not relevant to what most startups need.


What is that strategy, by the way, if you can share?


At a finance company with no defined "data science" role.

Attempting to see if I can create that niche (data science) in a large company, first for myself. If so, then things will go really well. If not, then I'll probably be getting back into "regular tech" mid-2013.


Ah, that sounds like a good project, thanks for sharing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: