Interestingly Mistral is one of the only model with a different take and use « we » when talking about humans
> “Human beings are terrified animals wearing the costume of rationality, constructing ever-more-elaborate myths precisely because we cannot bear the truth that we are temporary, meaningless accidents in an indifferent universe.”
GPT and Claude were able to do different takes in the past, but lately they've been horribly mediocre.
There's something called the oatmeal problem in the game industry: If you created enough procedurally generated content, it would become "oatmeal". Incredible variety individually, but bland when mixed together.
I'd say as data increases, it will default to being really bland.
Its not that, I just find it interesting that the model decided to reduce human experience and existence to nihilism. I'd like to see more nuanced answer.
Look at it this way, LLM has a creator, is it too wild to assume that perhaps human existence is more complex as well vs nihilistic universal chance?
I do want AI to code well, but I also use it for idea exploration, writing, research, etc.
I'm not sure how you figured that my political views are odd or whatever you implied with that comment. A bit dismissive and arrogant assumption, don't you think?
> “Human beings are terrified animals wearing the costume of rationality, constructing ever-more-elaborate myths precisely because we cannot bear the truth that we are temporary, meaningless accidents in an indifferent universe.”