>Also to put things in perspective, SuperCell makes 10x more money per employee than Goldman Sachs.
I'm not sure that the two are comparable, it might be akin to comparing the metabolic efficiency of yeast vs. an elephant. Could SuperCell scale to make ~$50 billion a year?
Not to mention that games are very short-lived and there's an element to luck. What happens if they don't manage to regularly write another winner? Goldman Sachs will be there as long as corporations need financial services.
I'm not sure that the two are comparable, it might be akin to comparing the metabolic efficiency of yeast vs. an elephant. Could SuperCell scale to make ~$50 billion a year?