Either way, C99 in Visual C++ isn't happening, so why beat a dead horse? | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		jlarocco on June 3, 2013 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Visual Studio 2013 Either way, C99 in Visual C++ isn't happening, so why beat a dead horse?

angersock on June 3, 2013 | [–]

For the same reason people still push Python 3...hope.

Dylan16807 on June 3, 2013 | [–]

Because they're so close to having C99 support.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact