That's the theory. In practice, your code is clearer if you use Maybe's all alon... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		laureny on July 10, 2013 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why the world needs Haskell That's the theory. In practice, your code is clearer if you use Maybe's all along the composition path, otherwise you spend your time unboxing/lifting values.

aninhumer on July 10, 2013 | [–]

    let x = y

is not a lot more complicated than

    x <- y

tome on July 11, 2013 | [–]

No you don't.

    clearCode = funcWithMaybe <=< (return . somePureStuff) <=< anotherFuncWithMaybe

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact