Can you please take the time to understand what's going on before letting us all know you have a hard time listening to arguments that nobody's actually making?
Eucalyptus doesn't ship the Kama Sutra. It's just an e-book reader, with the ability to search Project Gutenberg. If Apple were being consistent in the application of some policy, they would either allow this application, or they would have to reject a whole slew of other apps, including their Safari browser that ships by default.
I understand that. However, Apple is free to apply whatever criteria they want, however they want. Expecting 100% fairness in all cases is mind-numbingly naive.
To make the argument that Apple is "evil" because they disallowed something they had a right to by applying standards they decided upon is nothing more than trying to make a private entity do what you want without regard to the freedoms of that entity.
Expecting 100% fairness in all cases is mind-numbingly naive.
So, since unfairness is inevitable, we shouldn't call it out when it appears? That's just retarded.
nothing more than trying to make a private entity do what you want without regard to the freedoms of that entity.
What are you rambling about? I'm not holding a gun to anyone's head. How does voicing my opinion amount to disregarding their freedom? They're free to be dickheads. They're also free to ignore me, and to not receive my dollars in the future.
Eucalyptus doesn't ship the Kama Sutra. It's just an e-book reader, with the ability to search Project Gutenberg. If Apple were being consistent in the application of some policy, they would either allow this application, or they would have to reject a whole slew of other apps, including their Safari browser that ships by default.