> Textbook "evil", no. But, it wouldn't be hard to stop these things. Apple takes a calculated approach because they know the few wrongfully rejected apps won't cost them as much money as implementing a beefier review process
in other words, you advocate spending more money on reviews. how much? an amount that costs more than the bad PR. you say this explicitly.
how much is "more than the bad PR"? quite a lot. you and i both agree the PR is a big deal.
> Textbook "evil", no. But, it wouldn't be hard to stop these things. Apple takes a calculated approach because they know the few wrongfully rejected apps won't cost them as much money as implementing a beefier review process
in other words, you advocate spending more money on reviews. how much? an amount that costs more than the bad PR. you say this explicitly.
how much is "more than the bad PR"? quite a lot. you and i both agree the PR is a big deal.