sirclueless implied that int64_t was not C99, which is wrong. | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		mrb on Sept 30, 2013 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Going long long on time_t sirclueless implied that int64_t was not C99, which is wrong.

cbsmith on Sept 30, 2013 [–]

I think if you re-read what was written, what you think was implied was not.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact