Does all of that $1100/hr go to Bromwich, or is it payed to the federal government (or the company that pays Bromwich) who then pays Bromwich some percentage of that? We've had contracts at work for $80,000/yr where the contractor only saw $50,000 of that. The rest was payed to the company he worked for.
If the entire sum isn't going to Bromwich or if the court agrees with the price he's charging, I'd chalk it up to being the price you pay for anti-trust behavior. Then again, I don't know how much a company should pay for compliance monitoring after being convicted of anti-trust behavior. Either way it is a lot of money, but if it's not all going to Bromwich's pockets, it sounds like a fine being imposed for the duration of the anti-trust monitoring.
That's exactly the differentiation I tried to raise in my point. Is this a fine paid to the government who then pays the lawyer some percentage, or is all of this money going to the lawyer? One would be acceptable, the other would be less so.
If the entire sum isn't going to Bromwich or if the court agrees with the price he's charging, I'd chalk it up to being the price you pay for anti-trust behavior. Then again, I don't know how much a company should pay for compliance monitoring after being convicted of anti-trust behavior. Either way it is a lot of money, but if it's not all going to Bromwich's pockets, it sounds like a fine being imposed for the duration of the anti-trust monitoring.