I felt like I got dropped into the middle of a book with this. Is this accurate?
1) Bicycle helmut laws are enacted
2) As a result, the amount of bicycling has dropped in NZ precipitously
3) Leading to all sorts of negative things like higher obesity and pollution
4) And the medical benefits aren't that significant
Therefore mandatory bike helmut laws are more damaging than good?
1) Bicycle helmut laws are enacted 2) As a result, the amount of bicycling has dropped in NZ precipitously 3) Leading to all sorts of negative things like higher obesity and pollution 4) And the medical benefits aren't that significant
Therefore mandatory bike helmut laws are more damaging than good?