Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

i know you have the intellectual curiousity of a sausage, but some of us are simply interested. we don't all need to be motivated by logic.

how would you derive it? tagging pairs of hex digits and sorting doesn't cut it. would rivest have used a hack that's a biased shuffle? i doubt it.

and downvotes. happy xmas!



You're right. I was snippy, and in a particularly dumb way. Sorry about that.


But happy to admit it in a reasonable way. A responsible disclosure of errors if you will.


eh, no need to apologise. i think we're used to you here and there's a level of tolerance given the contributions you make.

also, did you see http://www.jakoblell.com/blog/2013/12/22/practical-malleabil... which i think could be added to an early crypto challenge? (but maybe you already cover the idea).


CBC bitflipping is in set #2. Incidentally, somewhere in the mists of time is a very weird blog post ("If You're Typing The Letters A-E-S Into Your Code, You're Doing It Wrong") I wrote describing how to implement this attack --- though not against LUKS.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: