This is basically just saying "Choose Sweet.js in combination with some unknown array of macro libraries as your only language that compiles to JavaScript."
But because the article doesn't really frame it this way, it doesn't really explain to me why I would choose Sweet.js over ClojureScript or Scala.js or Black Coffee or whatever.
But because the article doesn't really frame it this way, it doesn't really explain to me why I would choose Sweet.js over ClojureScript or Scala.js or Black Coffee or whatever.