Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not sure accelerated evolution is the right term, but the idea makes sense. Changing conditions exert selections pressures.

Dietary changes would have been a substantial. Lactose tolerance, for example is almost certainly new.



You can accelerate without changing speed - it's a vector.


evolution is not directional


I think that if the rate of genetic change increases then acceleration is an fair word.

If one defined the prevalence of each gene in the population you would get a vector were you could possibly 'change direction'. None of this requires any metric of 'goodness' to be defined if that is what you are worried about.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: