> Boomerang is awesome. And it will tell you when an email hasn't been replied to. But it won't automatically bump until you get a response.
That's because Boomerang understands and meets widely accepted email standards of behavior.
> We think Rebump saves time and workflow that way.
It's spam. No blizzard of words, however blinding, can change its identity. It renames a deplorable social email practice, but without changing its identity.
Civilized people write once, then wait for a reply. Spammers "bump" over and over again until they either get a reply or are classed as spam.
> Civilized people remind their friends, coworkers and clients to follow-up on important emails.
Civilized people have inboxes and outboxes. If an e-mail isn't transferred to the the inbox, the pending-action category, then any attempt to change its status by repeat mails is at the very least disrespectful of the recipient's choice of priorities.
All I am saying is that you need to find out how people think about these things. You're well past explaining, now you're rationalizing.
That's because Boomerang understands and meets widely accepted email standards of behavior.
> We think Rebump saves time and workflow that way.
It's spam. No blizzard of words, however blinding, can change its identity. It renames a deplorable social email practice, but without changing its identity.
Civilized people write once, then wait for a reply. Spammers "bump" over and over again until they either get a reply or are classed as spam.