In reality the Lytro has abysmal performance, which questions the value of lightfield technology as a whole.
Instead of capturing the 'light field' you may as well capture most of the image.
Secondly the loss of the 2nd derivative of the k-vector makes lightfield currently unsuitable for use in a microscope (although they are working on it...). Although there might be better techniques for refocusing, such as division in the spatial frequency domain.
Instead of capturing the 'light field' you may as well capture most of the image.
Secondly the loss of the 2nd derivative of the k-vector makes lightfield currently unsuitable for use in a microscope (although they are working on it...). Although there might be better techniques for refocusing, such as division in the spatial frequency domain.
see http://www.cnet.com.au/nokia-vs-lytro-the-refocusing-challen...