The competition you describe exists now. Having a new "winner" won't change the point being made in the article. I don't agree with the conclusion he came to, but he's pointing out issues with there being a winner whose site is the de facto place where code / project / people go.
> he's pointing out issues with there being a winner whose site is the de facto place where code / project / people go.
That's likely true. However, it ignores whether or not those issues are outweighed by the substantial benefits to a de facto place that everyone goes, which are generally very large.
