Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Disclaimer: I work for Google as the product manager for Persistent Disk.

I suspect that what crb is referring to is the ratio of 30 IOPS/GB being the top ratio that could be bought and what that would cost on a per GB basis. I don't think crb was suggesting a 1 GB volume.

As for the specific case you describe - looking for 30 IOPS consistently on a 50 GB volume, with Google, there is no need to go to SSD for that or to pay $16.25/month.

- If you meant 30 random reads, you can hit that with 100GB of Standard PD for $4.00/month (with no IO charges)

- If you meant 30 random writes, it's less as 50 GB gets you 75 random write IOPS for $2.00/month (with no IO charges)

At Google, we've tried to bring consistency of performance even to the lower tier of block storage so no matter what level of IO you need, you can count on seeing a consistent level between volumes and over time.

So, how do you choose between the two PD types? As a very coarse rule of thumb:

- If you are looking for 2 random read IOPS / GB or less, growing Standard PD volumes to meet the IOPS needs is the most cost effective route

- If you are looking for 2-30 IOPS/GB, SSD Persistent Disk gets you the better value



Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: