Well they are certainly a thing when you can point out examples of them aren't they.
Perhaps this structure works best in cultures that have difficulty accepting failure. Moving on to another project when one isn't working out is easier than admitting defeat after the failure of a whole company. It's the same obviously but psychologically it's easier for us.
Generally I have this sneaking intuition that the success of the multiple project approach depends on the size of the market and the type of consumers. It's fairly well accepted that it's harder to start rocket-ship type startups in the UK than it is in the US. Perhaps we are better suited to this approach?
Either way, I like the idea and it seems to be the business version of what more product-focused engineers do in their spare time. I am personally aiming to create a project a year at this point and would like to make them additive too if I can.
Perhaps this structure works best in cultures that have difficulty accepting failure. Moving on to another project when one isn't working out is easier than admitting defeat after the failure of a whole company. It's the same obviously but psychologically it's easier for us.
Generally I have this sneaking intuition that the success of the multiple project approach depends on the size of the market and the type of consumers. It's fairly well accepted that it's harder to start rocket-ship type startups in the UK than it is in the US. Perhaps we are better suited to this approach?
Either way, I like the idea and it seems to be the business version of what more product-focused engineers do in their spare time. I am personally aiming to create a project a year at this point and would like to make them additive too if I can.
This, to me, is companies operating as people.