Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The eager user in me is delighted there's a place to save my bookmarks.

The paranoid user is worried Google will have access to my saved sites and sell my usage stats.

The nostalgic user is still irritated that Google Reader could have still been saved and this feature appended.



Google sells targeted ads, not usage data.


Where's the difference?


In selling usage data:

Someone pays Google, gets your usage data (and can do with it whatever they want).

In selling targetted ads:

Someone pays Google and gives them a specification of what kind of people they'd like to see the ads, and Google uses the usage data they already have to select who to show the ad to.

At the end:

In the former case, Google and the third party both have your data.

In the latter case, Google has the data, and the third party does not.


Whether third parties see information about your online behaviour or not. Is that not clear?


The end goal is the same but the only party with your information is Google as opposed to a third party.



I'm not sure what you think that page describes, but it's NOT a way to buy data about how a person uses a google product.


You see, I know exactly what this page describes ;-)


> The paranoid user is worried Google will have access to my saved sites and sell my usage stats.

Google doesn't have access to your bookmarks if you set your Chrome sync encryption password to something other than your Google password. When first launching the new bookmark manager, you'll even get a privacy message in the manager reminding you that Google does not have access to your custom sync encryption password.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: