No, facts are facts even if no one can prove it. It's just that if you can't prove it, you can't know if a certain claim (like "the sun rose today") is actually a fact or not.
I think what icebraining was trying to say is:
A fact is not a opinion that is proven to be true.
A fact is a opinion that is true and can be proven to be true even if we don't yet know how. In which case we simply don't yet know that said opinion is a fact.
I'm not sure if this definition is correct but I'm fairly certain this is what icebraining meant.