I have read the article. Nowhere does it claim that the reason for this is that FM is simply "old". They believe that DAB is better for particular reasons - choice, they want to reclaim the bandwidth etc. You disagree with that, but it has nothing to do with simply the age of FM.
Nobody has argued that the reason they want to replace FM is that it is old. So why challenge that argument?
Nobody has argued that the reason they want to replace FM is that it is old. So why challenge that argument?