A false flag operation initiated by America is an absurd idea? What about all the documented and public comings and goings of when America has done just that?
How in the hell is the notion of America creating an enemy to rally against absurd when there is proof of it occurring in the past?
Many people say the Gulf of Tonkin incident which initiated the Vietnam "conflict" was also one.
I'm astounded that you can make a statement like that when there is such black and white proof of such incidents occurring in the past. I'm not talking about 9/11, I'm just saying that it isn't out of the realm of possibility for a government to manufacture an enemy.
What I'm wondering is, are you just ignorant and you've never heard of these documented false flag operations? Or instead have you heard of these things and choose not to believe it?
You present evidence that the US has done such things in the past as evidence that it is not absurd to believe that 9/11 was a false flag operation.
But why is the idea that 9/11 was an inside job absurd? Is the only reason because people consider it absurd that the US would ever do such a thing? Or is it possible to believe that, yes, the US has done such things, but it is absurd to think that 9/11 was one of them?
I submit that it is possible to believe that the US has done such things, and also possible - even reasonable - to believe that it is still absurd to think that 9/11 was such an event.
Whether or not 9/11 was a priori suspicious is irrelevant. It's not September 12, 2001, it's nearly 15 years later and the investigations are long-finished and utterly conclusive.
> A false flag operation initiated by America is an absurd
> idea? What about all the documented and public comings
> and goings of when America has done just that?
I am confused by the links you follow up with. The first is a _rejected_ false-flag operation against American civilians, the second is CIA action overseas. The Gulf of Tonkin incident saw ... no American casualties.
And you use these as some kind of proof that the idea of the US government knowingly killing 3,000 of its own citizens, causing massive economic damage to the US, isn't absurd?!
> What I'm wondering is, are you just ignorant and you've never
> heard of these documented false flag operations? Or instead have
> you heard of these things and choose not to believe it?
What, the first one, which never happened, or the second one which wasn't a false-flag incident against the American people, or the third one which involved no American casualties?
A false flag operation initiated by America is an absurd idea? What about all the documented and public comings and goings of when America has done just that?
How in the hell is the notion of America creating an enemy to rally against absurd when there is proof of it occurring in the past?
Operation Northwoods - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Project TP-Ajax - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat
Many people say the Gulf of Tonkin incident which initiated the Vietnam "conflict" was also one.
I'm astounded that you can make a statement like that when there is such black and white proof of such incidents occurring in the past. I'm not talking about 9/11, I'm just saying that it isn't out of the realm of possibility for a government to manufacture an enemy.
What I'm wondering is, are you just ignorant and you've never heard of these documented false flag operations? Or instead have you heard of these things and choose not to believe it?