Its layout is reasonable, and it seems to have a fairly comprehensive coverage of the topic. Its not overwhelming like w3.org. I can find what I want to know with relative ease (unlike w3.org)
I have seen a couple of articles pointing out that their implementation details are bad, but I don't think I have ever gone on there with the intention of clicking "view source"
Its layout is reasonable, and it seems to have a fairly comprehensive coverage of the topic. Its not overwhelming like w3.org. I can find what I want to know with relative ease (unlike w3.org)
I have seen a couple of articles pointing out that their implementation details are bad, but I don't think I have ever gone on there with the intention of clicking "view source"