Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I found the question of whether he really doesn't understand the technical meaning of "back door" or is conscientiously trying to re-brand away from the negative connotations of the term particularly interesting. Maybe "side-door" would work?


It's so incredibly disingenuous. We're talking about a long established technical term with a precise meaning, but when world leaders are demanding it, they're uncomfortable using that term because it sounds like exactly what it is.

Saying it's "not a back door" is simply a lie, and I'm sure they or their advisors know it.


He's trying to make it sound like they don't want anything bad, they're not 'sneaking in' they want a legal way to see all your stuff.

He clearly knows what it means, what he's asking for and he knows it sounds bad when it's called a back door.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: