Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Did you consider that it might not have been an option? That maybe it was an unexpected termination, and they didn't have a way to know about or contact the people arriving from out of town?

You don't have enough information to speculate like that.



OK, $FamousPerson shows up at reception asking for an employee who has recently been escorted off the premises with their possessions in a black plastic bag (been there, got the video and t-shirt). You sort of know that random $FamousPeople showing up is part of $BusinessAsUsual. You have just realised that you have apparently no procedures whatsoever for booking appointments for personal visits to the building (e.g. popping something on a corporate Google calendar or Outlook).

So, you get $HighRankingPerson - preferably one with good empathy and small talk skills - to meet $FamousPerson, explain that, unfortunately, there has had to be a change of plan today. Meanwhile $TrustedPersonalAssistant has Googled $FamousPerson, worked out likely food preferences and made contact with $FamousPerson's PR people/publisher/agent/whatever. Nice restaurant booked for lunch. $FuturePlans discussed over (rather good wine | excellent smoothies | extremely expensive vintage cheese and crackers | exceptional artisian toast). Limousine booked to get $FamousPerson back to airport in time for trip home.

Not rocket science is it really? (I speak as one who has been told to F$$k Off by Royalty).


Do you see any famous person bitterly complaining and starting petitions because their AMA fell through? It was probably quite inconvenient for the few people who got affected by this at the time but it hardly merits a subreddit let alone sitewide meltdown.


$FamousPeople over here never complain in public. But, you know, the temperature changes. Small signals &c. Perhaps it is different in US.

I personally have no big interest in this but Steven Hawkins is a National Treasure and we do need to present a positive view of science to the yoot.


Several celebrities and scientists complained on twitter because their IAMAs were abruptly interrupted or cancelled.


Based in schedule and timing should we be able to figure out who $FamousPerson is/was?


OT, but is there somewhere I can read your story of having been told to to F$$k off by Royalty?


No.

This will give you an idea...

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-philip-quotes-re...

Edit: apologies for duplicate. Could not see the original reply


This is comedy gold.

As an American who isn't an Anglophile, I didn't know that Prince Philip was so "colorful". People used to make fun of George W. Bush, but Philip takes it to a whole other level. In half of those comments he's just the village idiot, in the other half he's a master of British humour.

Edit: of course, opinions will vary as to which comment belongs in which category.


> Did you consider that it might not have been an option? That maybe it was an unexpected termination, and they didn't have a way to know about or contact the people arriving from out of town?

Then you get a substitute for the appointment, even if you have to delay it. You don't just tell the client that the appointment is cancelled and to have a nice day.

> You don't have enough information to speculate like that.

There is no information that can make the way the out of town guest was treated acceptable.


> There is no information that can make the way the out of town guest was treated acceptable.

Sorry, but is this guest the Queen of England or the Pope? Did the mods pay for his/her way to New York? As the GP said, this is an overreaction -- the mods act as if insulting one celebrity means that IAMA, a subreddit that was originally populated by regular reddit users, has been inconvertibly sullied. Or that they, the mods themselves, spent their lives savings to fly that celebrity into town. I'm not saying that the celebrity deserved to be snubbed, but non-conspiracy-shit happens, and firing/rehirings can be a chaotic process that yes, sometimes lasts longer than a couple of days.


Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith has a considerable staff who would have managed the situation with their customary grace and good humour. Piss off Prince Philip however and you could be in for a hard time.

http://i.imgur.com/ICSz7Xp.jpg

Image of a now deleted discussion between the Science moderators and the chap who runs Reddit posted down the screen. The bit that caught my eye...

"We were right in the middle of setting up an AMA with Steven Hawking when I don't know what happened"

This organisation has problems.


Wow. I thought maybe it was just one comment, but Alexis really has been doing a job on reddit's PR. Why wouldn't you be more open an honest with people running the best known feature of your site?

In the end, the mods ditched reddit for actually handling AMAs, so I guess that's a good thing. Plus it'll mean reddit simply won't have monetization options as far as commercializing r/IAmA.


Having celebrities is more than commercialization. It's legitimacy...I've never liked (most) of the celebrity AMAs, but saying that you had President Obama logged in, however nominally, goes a long way to counter the perception that Reddit is just a place for Coontown and The Fappening.


> Sorry, but is this guest the Queen of England or the Pope?

Irrelevant. You make a commitment to someone, you keep it or make alternate arrangements.

> Did the mods pay for his/her way to New York?

Completely irrelevant, as this is about how the company treated a guest.

> As the GP said, this is an overreaction -- the mods act as if insulting one celebrity means that IAMA, a subreddit that was originally populated by regular reddit users, has been inconvertibly sullied.

I would argue that it has been. To what degree, and whether it materially affects the sub, remains to be seen.

> Or that they, the mods themselves, spent their lives savings to fly that celebrity into town.

No, they aren't. Not even close.

> I'm not saying that the celebrity deserved to be snubbed

No, but you are implying that it is a trivial occurrence.

> but non-conspiracy-shit happens, and firing/rehirings can be a chaotic process that yes, sometimes lasts longer than a couple of days.

I know shit happens. I almost used that phrase myself above. However, there is a proper response to shit happening. In this case there should have been some sort of alternative arrangement made for the person coming in, even if it was just a managed delay to figure something out. You do not just turn someone who came to town to see someone at your organization out on the street on their own.


Irrelevant. You make a commitment to someone, you keep it or make alternate arrangements.

How is it irrelevant? It's absolutely relevant.

When you make a commitment to someone to do a heart transplant, you better move heaven and earth to keep it and prepare for every conceivable contingency.

When you let go a public-facing employee, even if you mishandle the communication about it and a few people get briefly inconvenienced as a consequence, it's a regrettable mistake of the sort that unfortunately happen sometimes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: