Maybe it's just me, but I reserve downvotes for trolling, intentionally misleading, flamebaiting, or off topic posts. If I see something I disagree with, I'll post a response instead of downvoting (as I am in this case). Downvoting purely because you disagree, especially without a rebuttal, is simply censorship.
He didn't say his belief is the only right one. It did contribute to the conversation for some of us. And I agree with a sibling commenter, downvoting should ideally be reserved for non-serious/troll comments?
Depends how it's phrased. If someone says "I like liquorice" then I'm not going to downvote. But if someone said "liquorice is the best food in the world" as if it was a fact, then I am going to downvote. If OP said "It is my opinion that Jupiter was created by god" I would not have downvoted. But it's his stating it as a fact which is making me downvote.