Your inference is incorrect. I don't know them and have no reason to judge them.
They said "I'm honestly curious on why [the comment was downvoted]". I conjectured the original heavily downvoted comment may have been interpreted as boastful through comparison of a personal situation to AirBnB's and that's why people may have voted it down. I received 17 upvotes for this speculation which may (or may not) support my hunch.
May Simone, and everyone, do "something awesome." But not merely, as you, passive aggressively (and quite needlessly) conclude, to "show" anything up.
I was not passive aggressive. I call that actively aggressive. Because you were using vague indirect statements to say that this guy is worthless. I openly described it as such.
I don't know Simone either, but I'd say there's a fair chance he can contribute more than some illegal hotel scheme. I was pretty disgusted that you value this hype above a human being, and I don't care what 17 other similarly amoral individuals may have said.
They said "I'm honestly curious on why [the comment was downvoted]". I conjectured the original heavily downvoted comment may have been interpreted as boastful through comparison of a personal situation to AirBnB's and that's why people may have voted it down. I received 17 upvotes for this speculation which may (or may not) support my hunch.
May Simone, and everyone, do "something awesome." But not merely, as you, passive aggressively (and quite needlessly) conclude, to "show" anything up.