Why would Google hire only the tech team? Home services seems like the sort of thing that absolutely demands a solid customer service and sales organization.
Maybe because they are proven capable to deliver technology team, which Google has many ways to employ, that was about to be unemployed en masse given that Homejoy was suspending operations and thus likely wasn't going to have much for them to do, or anything with which to pay them.
> Home services seems like the sort of thing that absolutely demands a solid customer service and sales organization.
If Google, as was reported months ago, is well on its way to offering its own product in this market than, whether or not Homejoy's tech team was (as is claimed, without any stated basis or source, in the Re/Code article) hired to work on it, its likely that the customer service and sales structure for it is already decided. If the model isn't fundamentally what Homejoy was doing, there's not necessarily any reason to think that Homejoy's team in that area would be of any use to Google's product.
OTOH, whether on a home services product or otherwise, Google probably can find lots of uses for engineering talent.
It's not at all clear they had a solid support and sales setup. The company folded for a reason - why would you buy a company and run it the same way it was run before, if it was about to fold under those same processes?
I don't really know. I worked for a startup once that was acqui-hired by Google and they hired all technical staff and other than the executives they made all the non-technical stuff redundant.
Perhaps they are paying a little premium on hiring themselves to get a single team started and working on something very quickly?
