You should try Lemmy. It feels a lot like Reddit did in like 2012. Small, but a great community.

And the difference is that humans will learn not to make that mistake anymore.

That's very optimistic.

Thankfully humans have only been around for about 20 hours!

It very much is. It’s more like telling an intern what to do and then reviewing their code. Anyone can do it, and it results in (mostly) slop.

AI will be writing the code for shit-slop apps and libraries. The good ones will be written by humans.

Good for them. Keep your projects human made by adopting a good policy. I use this one:

https://sciactive.com/human-contribution-policy/

I mean, look at the source. This is from an AI company.

That is _definitely_ copyright infringement.

Yeah, that's why I said clean-ish room. I'm thinking more about open source projects here that you just want available in a new language, without any architectural "cruft" copied from the original (since different language idioms may imply different architectures), than trying to evade copyright on something commercial. Most commercial stuff isn't making its code base public in the first place anyways.

You also really need to review its logic too, because it has a tendency to lack the full context of the code it’s working on, and make very silly logic mistakes.

1000%

People who claim AGI from these chatbots don't doublecheck the work.

I rereleased this as public domain, since it’s all AI generated, so it is public domain:

https://github.com/hperrin/gnata