The FDIC is funded by banks. The FDIC did not have to use taxpayer dollars during the financial crisis. In practice, the FDIC has not been involved in these socialized risks you speak of, though if it ran out of money, the government would back it up.
The FDIC also provides public benefits, like avoiding economy-crippling bank runs.
The FDIC is bailed out by the taxpayer, so does the private banks. It's a nothing but socializing the risks, while privatizing the profits. It's immoral.
China does things right here, when it fails due to your corruption, you get executed, instead of bailed out.
The FDIC has never been bailed out, and as I pointed out, there are plenty of public benefits to that government guarantee. We would be less wealthy as a society without it.
BUT it's also a form of "insurance". If there's a suspect a bank won't be able to honor deposits, bank run ensues, THEN the given bank can't honor deposits obviously, because no bank works like that today, that is: self fulfilling prophecy
If you don't trust the bank, don't put your money there. Otherwise, put your money at the Bank of the United States, backed by and owned by the full faith of the US taxpayer.
I will not bail out private money making banks via the FDIC via my tax dollar.
If you put money into a private bank, then when it fails, you should lose that money.
I will not bail out private money making banks via the FDIC via my tax dollar.
Never in American history has the FDIC had to take a "tax dollar" during a bank failure. The government does back it, yes--but the amount of private money in the FDIC makes it extremely unlikely that bank failures even at the scope we were looking at in 2008 will tap them out.
